Author: evidencepolicyblog

Building trust, managing expectations and overcoming organisational differences: how to solve complex problems through collaboration?

evidencepolicyblogLeave a comment

Alexis Dewaele

This blog post is based on the Evidence & Policy article, ‘A grounded theory on collaborative interactions in a community-university partnership: the case of youth in the public space’.

In a society that is steered by complex processes such as globalisation and institutional complexity, we are increasingly confronted with what is sometimes called ‘wicked problems’ (i.e., a problem that is difficult or impossible to solve because of incomplete, contradictory, and changing requirements that are often difficult to recognise). At Ghent University in Belgium, we were interested in trying to solve such problems by setting up a collaboration with diverse community stakeholders. We sent out a call to diverse stakeholders asking them to submit proposals on societal challenges that could be addressed by bringing together various actors and making use of scientific knowledge. An employee of the municipal department of well-being and equal opportunities submitted a case related to antisocial behavior by youth at a municipal park. The researchers involved selected the case as a pilot project to further investigate collaborative processes. For our study published in Evidence & Policy, we analysed a set of four video recorded co-creation sessions of this particular case to learn to better understand the process of how knowledge exchange can actually contribute to problem solving.

Continue reading →

For what purposes is research evidence used in legislatures? What are the enablers and hindrances to using evidence in these settings?

evidencepolicyblogLeave a comment

Mathieu Ouimet

This blog post is based on the Evidence & Policy article, ‘Use of research evidence in legislatures: a systematic review’.

Our Evidence and Policy article reports the findings from a systematic review of how and for what purpose legislators use research evidence. It also examines legislators’ perspectives on enablers and barriers to using research evidence.

We searched for all published studies, either in English or French, in which the type of use and the barriers and facilitators to using research evidence by legislators were empirically examined. We included relevant studies regardless of the year of publication, the country where the study was conducted or the kind of legislatures. We found twenty-one studies, most of which were conducted in the United States. There has been a noticeable growth in studies since the 2010s.

Continue reading →

How do you know if you are making a difference? Is your data culture getting in the way?

evidencepolicyblogLeave a comment

Sarah Morton and Ailsa Cook

We gain fascinating insights working alongside organisations across sectors in public services, that want to use data and evidence well to understand and track their impact. We specialise in working with organisations where it is hard to simply measure the difference they make, and where the main focus for change is relationships: work that educates, empowers, inspires, supports, encourages or influences people. What we have observed over the last 5 years, is that every organisation is influenced by their data culture, but it is rarely talked about. It is something we highlight in our new book: How do you know you are making a difference, from Policy Press.

Through our company Matter of Focus, we support organisations to understand the context for their work, set out their theories of change, and use this as a lens to collect and analyse data that can help them understand their change processes and evidence the difference they make. This means we host workshops and meetings where people really get to grips with different elements of their work, and we see what is inside the pandora’s box when organisations start to review the data they hold about their own work.

Continue reading →

The long game: understanding and maximising researchers’ policy engagement activities across career levels

evidencepolicyblogLeave a comment

Alice Windle and Joanne Arciuli

This blog post is based on the Evidence & Policy article, ‘Research-policy engagement activities and research impact: nursing and health science researcher perspectives’.

There are many ways in which researchers try to influence policy using the evidence that they produce. Studies have examined such research-policy engagement activities in public health, but little is known about what nursing and health sciences researchers do to promote the impact of their research in terms of policy. Our Evidence and Policy article explores nursing and health sciences researchers’ experiences of activities to promote their research and influence policy, across different career stages. It also explored researchers’ perspectives on barriers and enablers to maximising policy engagement.

Continue reading →

Knowledge brokers in local policy spaces: early career researchers and dynamic ideas

evidencepolicyblogLeave a comment

Sarah Weakley and David Waite

This blog post is based on the Evidence & Policy article, ‘Academic knowledge brokering in local policy spaces: negotiating and implementing dynamic idea types’.

It is now commonplace for many academics within higher education institutions to simultaneously take on the roles of both knowledge producers and knowledge brokers in policy spaces as part of their everyday working. In these roles at the intersection of the evidence and policy nexus, they undertake traditional research activities but also engage with policy actors using their research ideas and expertise to change conversations and develop solutions to policy problems. In our new article in Evidence and Policy, ‘Academic knowledge brokering in local policy spaces: negotiating and implementing dynamic idea types’, we reflect on how ideas move within local policy spaces and the hands that move them. We considered this issue in the context our own work with local bodies in two different policy arenas – one looking at social recovery after Covid-19 and one focussed on socioeconomic change.

Continue reading →

Embracing creativity in co-production using the arts

evidencepolicyblogLeave a comment

Stephen MacGregor, Amanda Cooper, Michelle Searle and Tiina Kukkonen

This blog post is based on the Evidence & Policy article, ‘Co-production and arts-informed inquiry as creative power for knowledge mobilisation’, part of the Special Issue on Creativity and Co-production.

The days of research reports going unread by all but their authors and articles being hidden behind publisher paywalls are giving way to more collaborative research approaches. One that has provoked great attention in recent years is co-production, an approach that acknowledges the unique knowledge and expertise different individuals can bring to the research process. However, the evidence base for co-production has not kept pace with the excitement surrounding it.

In our recent Evidence & Policy article, we asked, ‘How can seeing co-production as a creative endeavour create opportunities to move knowledge into action?’ To answer this question, we examined three cases focused on promoting shared understanding and action in the Canadian education sector. Each case used artful practices to promote meaningful reflection, understanding and representation of individual and communal experiences.

Unique to our study was the use of a realist perspective. Realist explanations look to develop reasoned pathways from specific mechanisms and contexts to observed outcomes (see Pawson & Tilley, 1997). Researchers typically refer to these as CMO configurations and represent the expression as: context + mechanism = outcome. These explanations are helpful because we can learn about the possibility of transferring lessons learned from one instance of co-production to another. What’s more, by comparing these CMO configurations across our three cases, we can identify common propositions about arts-informed approaches to co-production.

Continue reading →

Entrepreneurial thinking: achieving policy impact

evidencepolicyblogLeave a comment

Matthew Flinders

This blog post is based on the Evidence & Policy article, ‘Entrepreneurial thinking: the politics and practice of policy impact’.

In a recent article in Evidence and Policy Steve Johnson suggests that entrepreneurship research may have had far more impact on society than it is generally credited with. In making this point Johnson stimulates a debate not just about the past, present and future of entrepreneurship research but about the science-society nexus more generally. In a commentary in Evidence and Policy I responded to Johnson’s argument through a focus on evidential standards and criticality.

When stripped down to its core thesis, Johnson’s argument is that entrepreneurship research may have had a number of non-academic and broadly positive impacts on society. The slight problem is that this claim relies upon enlightenment arguments about affecting public debate and shaping ideas that are incredibly hard to demonstrate or measure in a tangible manner. There are, of course, some academic studies that can claim and prove that they have shaped public discourse and affected public policy – the recent insights of behavioural economics and ‘nudge theory’ provide a good example – but such examples tend to be rare.

Continue reading →

Ethical expertise and pandemic governance: (how) did the UK government include ethical guidance in their COVID-19 response?

evidencepolicyblogLeave a comment

Theresa Sommer, Sarah Ball and Jessica Pykett

This blog post is based on the Evidence & Policy article, ‘Ethical moments and institutional expertise in UK Government COVID-19 pandemic policy responses: where, when and how is ethical advice sought?’.

The COVID-19 pandemic has posed significant challenges for governments, policy advisors and citizens alike. Wide-reaching and contentious decisions had to be made at a moment’s notice while evidence about the virus was scarce, and at times involved conflicting knowledge claims. Under these conditions of uncertainty and ambiguity, questions have emerged about how values and ethical advice played roles in the decision-making process.

In our Evidence & Policy article, we look beyond the discussion of scientific advice and ask where, when and how ethical advice was sought. The article is based on documentary analysis of policy papers and documents published by UK government advisory committees and a workshop with UK government ethics advisors and researchers. Our analysis focuses on both the temporal and spatial dimensions of ethical advice during the COVID-19 lockdown in the UK. By asking when and how ethical advice was sought, we set out to account for the (changing) role of ethics and point out distinct ethical moments and stages of how ethics were taken into consideration.

Continue reading →

The changing culture of evidence use in local government

evidencepolicyblogLeave a comment

Mandy Cheetham

This blog post is based on the Evidence & Policy article, ‘What I really want is academics who want to partner and who care about the outcome’: findings from a mixed-methods study of evidence use in local government in England’.

Background

It is recognised that closer interaction between those working in policy and practice and academic researchers increases the likelihood of evidence being used to improve outcomes, but progress remains slow. Policymakers and researchers continue to be seen (unhelpfully) as occupying separate worlds, with limited research undertaken into efforts to address this perceived division.

In this blog post, we outline the main messages from a recently published article in Evidence & Policy, which draws on a collaborative, mixed methods study funded by the Health Foundation: Local Authority Champions of Research (LACoR). We explore evidence use in the context of local government from the perspectives of those who work there.

Continue reading →

Understanding organisations that provide evidence for policy

evidencepolicyblogLeave a comment

Eleanor MacKillop and James Downe

This blog post is based on the Evidence & Policy article, ‘Knowledge brokering organisations: a new way of governing evidence’.

New organisations have emerged in different countries to help inform policymaking. Different from think tanks and academic research centres, these Knowledge Brokering Organisations (KBOs) attempt to influence policy by mobilising evidence. Our research examines how their origins and roles are rooted in politics, and explores their need to build credibility and legitimacy in their policy community. Despite examining KBOs on different continents – the Africa Centre for Evidence, the Mowat Centre in Canada and the Wales Centre for Public Policy – we show how they have become a tool mobilised in similar ways by their respective governments.

Continue reading →